virtio-pci: fix irqfd cleanup argument order

Order of arguments of kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release
got mixed up in all calls.
As a result users see assertions during cleanup.

Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

hw/virtio-pci.c

diff --git a/hw/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio-pci.c
index 0934246..212acd8 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-pci.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@
             continue;
         }
         if (proxy->vdev->guest_notifier_mask) {
-            kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, vector, queue_no);
+            kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector);
         }
         kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
     }
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@
          * Otherwise, it was cleaned when masked in the frontend.
          */
         if (proxy->vdev->guest_notifier_mask) {
-            kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, vector, queue_no);
+            kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector);
         }
         kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector);
     }
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@
     if (proxy->vdev->guest_notifier_mask) {
         proxy->vdev->guest_notifier_mask(proxy->vdev, queue_no, true);
     } else {
-        kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, vector, queue_no);
+        kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector);
     }
 }