dma/pl330: Fix misleading type

This type really should just be a regular int as no usages rely on it's
32 bitness (it's only meaningful as a bit position and not a bit mask).
This also fixes a printf which uses the variable with a regular %d.

Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 2a99d31f377aee371476d9da8fd0d1b7efa30f63.1393372019.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

hw/dma/pl330.c

diff --git a/hw/dma/pl330.c b/hw/dma/pl330.c
index 68adf39..d36f0bc 100644
--- a/hw/dma/pl330.c
+++ b/hw/dma/pl330.c
@@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@
                               uint64_t value, unsigned size)
 {
     PL330State *s = (PL330State *) opaque;
-    uint32_t i;
+    int i;
 
     DB_PRINT("addr: %08x data: %08x\n", (unsigned)offset, (unsigned)value);